Estimated reading time: 6 minutes

Trapped on the Corporate Ladder and What That Feeling Is Actually Telling You

The corporate ladder is a useful metaphor because it implies a single direction of movement and a single destination. Up. Everyone starts at the bottom and works their way up and eventually arrives somewhere. The metaphor is comforting because it is orderly. The problem with it is that it is not what actually happens for most people, and the gap between the metaphor and the reality is where the trapped feeling lives.

What the Feeling Is

Stagnation in a corporate environment is not the same as not moving. You are still doing work. The work is still getting done. The company is still functioning. What has stopped is the sense that any of this is building toward something. The difference between the early years in a corporate role — where every project teaches you something, where every promotion changes the nature of what you do — and the middle years, where the learning has plateaued and the promotions have become rare and political and often inexplicable, is the difference between movement and maintenance.

You are not being seen in the way that you used to be seen. Or you are being seen accurately, which is to say as someone reliable and competent and not urgently in need of development — which in corporate terms means not urgently in need of investment. Reliable and competent is the description of someone the system wants to keep exactly where they are. It is not a criticism. It is a management decision dressed up as a compliment.

What the Ladder Actually Is

The ladder is the institution’s organizational structure. Moving up it requires the institution to have a place for you higher up and to choose you for it over everyone else competing for the same space. Neither of these things is within your control. You can make yourself more qualified. You can make yourself more visible. You can develop the skills and relationships that make selection more likely. But you cannot make a vacancy appear, and you cannot make the decision yourself.

This is the part that career advice tends to underemphasize. The advice assumes that effort and skill and visibility are sufficient to produce advancement. They are necessary but not sufficient. They get you to the pool of candidates. What happens inside the pool is determined by factors — politics, timing, personal relationships at the decision-making level, organizational priorities that shift quarterly — that are only partially related to merit. The puppet who has been optimizing for the ladder for years and then discovers this tends to experience it as a specific kind of disillusionment.

What to Do With the Information

First: decide whether you want to be on this particular ladder. Not ladders in general — this one, at this company, in this industry. The feeling of being trapped is sometimes the feeling of being on the wrong ladder. Not stuck on it but simply wrong for it, or it wrong for you, in a way that more effort and patience will not resolve because the problem is fit rather than performance.

Second: separate your sense of value from the ladder’s assessment of it. The ladder is an organizational tool. Its judgments about your value are made in the context of what the organization needs, not in the context of what you are worth. These are different assessments and they diverge significantly in organizations that are poorly led, stagnant, or simply in a different place than you are in terms of where you are trying to go.

The decision we made was to stop trying to move up structures we did not control and build a structure we did. That is not the answer for everyone. But the recognition that the ladder is a choice rather than a given — that you are on it because you have been choosing to stay on it — is useful regardless of what you decide to do next.

More at Infernal Insights.

How To

Frequently Asked Questions